Repositório UNIFEI UNIFEI - Campus 2: Itabira PPG - Programas de Pós-Graduação Dissertações
Use este identificador para citar ou linkar para este item: https://repositorio.unifei.edu.br/jspui/handle/123456789/3448
Registro completo de metadados
Campo DCValorIdioma
dc.creatorRICOMINI, Thulio Eugenio Portes de Almeida-
dc.date.issued2022-07-24-
dc.identifier.citationRICOMINI, Thulio Eugenio Portes de Almeida. Aplicação do Analytic Hierarchy Process na priorização de valor para o cliente no processo de desenvolvimento de software. 2022. 62. Dissertação (Mestrado Profissional em Engenharia de Produção, Universidade Federal de Itajubá, Campus de Itabira, Minas Gerais, 2022.pt_BR
dc.identifier.urihttps://repositorio.unifei.edu.br/jspui/handle/123456789/3448-
dc.description.abstractFor the success in software development it is necessary to balance the objectives of suppliers with the needs of their customers; in this context, this work explores the prioritization of the dimensions of value for the customer in the development of software for fuel stations, being determined the main dimensions of value in the given context, as well as the division of dimensions into three subcriteria each, approaching the prioritization model of company decision-makers to the criteria of their customers. Thus, this research aims to present the main dimensions of value to the software customer for gas stations, comparing priorities with decision-makers and consumers, and presenting a value prioritization model for software suppliers for gas stations. For this, this work uses a systematic review of the literature to delimit the main dimensions of value according to the existing literature, answering how the value can be measured, what its main dimensions are, and what is the definition of value in the context of software development; following the dimensions are subdivided into three subcriteria each, the dimensions next to the subcriteria form the AHP model applied to 12 specialists divided between 6 decision-makers and 6 customers of a software company for posts, priorities are evaluated between the 12 responses and then between the two groups of decision-makers and customers. The available resource dimensions, costs, and delivery time are found as the main components of customer value in software development; available features are subdivided between software functionality, performance, and availability; cost subcriteria are fixed, variable and indirect costs; and delivery time was divided between deployment time, customization, and troubleshooting; the cost criterion is found as the leading dimension in the value composition for the customer, followed by the available resources and finally by the delivery time; when aggregate priorities are separated between decision-makers and customers there is a difference in prioritization, decision-makers having a greater relevance of available resources rather than costs, while customers point to costs as the main component of value; using the subcriteria is noted the availability of the software (as availability and troubleshooting time) as a point of attention for the software vendors. Finally, in the scenario of software development for gas stations, customer value is defined as the customer's qualitative perception of how well and how fast software can meet customer needs in contrast to the cost of software; there is also a need to expand research to other segments, to compare value prioritization in different user and product contexts.pt_BR
dc.description.sponsorshipAgência 1pt_BR
dc.languageporpt_BR
dc.publisherUniversidade Federal de Itajubápt_BR
dc.rightsAcesso Abertopt_BR
dc.subjectValor para o clientept_BR
dc.subjectCustomer Valuept_BR
dc.subjectAHPpt_BR
dc.subjectAHPpt_BR
dc.subjectDesenvolvimento de Softwarept_BR
dc.subjectSoftware Developmentpt_BR
dc.subjectDimensões de valorpt_BR
dc.subjectValue Dimensionspt_BR
dc.titleAplicação do Analytic Hierarchy Process na priorização de valor para o cliente no processo de desenvolvimento de softwarept_BR
dc.typeDissertaçãopt_BR
dc.date.available2022-07-21-
dc.date.available2023-01-25T17:18:58Z-
dc.date.accessioned2023-01-25T17:18:58Z-
dc.creator.Latteshttp://lattes.cnpq.br/3023804012449299pt_BR
dc.contributor.advisor1SANTOS, Ana Carolina Oliveira-
dc.contributor.advisor1Latteshttp://lattes.cnpq.br/8173965029579689pt_BR
dc.contributor.referee1SILVA NETTO, Roberto-
dc.contributor.referee1Latteshttp://lattes.cnpq.br/3751634633048511pt_BR
dc.contributor.referee2RIBEIRO JUNIOR, Hugo José-
dc.contributor.referee2Latteshttp://lattes.cnpq.br/8435488531944013pt_BR
dc.contributor.referee3CARVALHO, Henrique Duarte-
dc.contributor.referee3Latteshttp://lattes.cnpq.br/7552625336212384pt_BR
dc.description.resumoPara o sucesso no desenvolvimento de um software é necessário equilibrar os objetivos dos fornecedores às necessidades de seus clientes. Neste contexto, este trabalho explora a priorização das dimensões do valor para o cliente no desenvolvimento de software para postos de combustíveis, sendo determinadas as principais dimensões de valor no dado contexto, bem como a divisão das dimensões em três subcritérios cada, aproximando o modelo de priorização de decisores das empresas aos critérios de seus clientes. Assim, esta pesquisa tem o objetivo de apresentar as principais dimensões de valor para o cliente de software para postos de combustíveis, comparando as prioridades conforme decisores e consumidores, e apresentando um modelo de priorização de valor para fornecedores de software para postos. Para tanto, este trabalho utiliza de uma revisão sistemática da literatura para delimitar as principais dimensões de valor conforme a literatura existente, respondendo como o valor pode ser medido, quais suas principais dimensões e qual a definição de valor no contexto de desenvolvimento de software; na sequência as dimensões são subdividas em três subcritérios cada, as dimensões junto dos subcritérios formam o modelo AHP aplicado a 12 especialistas divididos entre 6 decisores e 6 clientes de uma empresa fornecedora de software para postos, as prioridades são avaliadas entre as 12 respostas e em seguida entre os dois grupos de decisores e clientes. São encontradas as dimensões recursos disponíveis, custos e tempo de entrega, como principais componentes do valor para o cliente no desenvolvimento de software; os recursos disponíveis são subdivididos entre funcionalidades do software, performance e disponibilidade; os subcritérios de custos são custos fixos, variáveis e indiretos; e tempo de entrega foi dividido entre tempo de implantação, customização e solução de problemas. É encontrado o critério de custos como principal dimensão na composição de valor para o cliente, seguido pelos recursos disponíveis e finalmente pelo tempo de entrega; quando as prioridades agregadas são separadas entre decisores e clientes há uma diferença de priorização, decisores tendo uma maior relevância dos recursos disponíveis ao invés de custos, enquanto clientes apontam custos como o principal componente de valor; utilizando dos subcritérios nota-se a disponibilidade do software (enquanto disponibilidade e tempo de solução de problemas) como ponto de atenção para os fornecedores do software. Finalmente, no cenário de desenvolvimento de software para postos de combustíveis, valor para o cliente define-se como a percepção qualitativa do cliente sobre o quão bem e quão rápido um software pode atender às necessidades do cliente em contraste ao custo do software; havendo ainda a necessidade de expandir a pesquisa para demais segmentos, a fim de comparar a priorização de valor quanto diferentes contextos de usuários e produtos.pt_BR
dc.publisher.countryBrasilpt_BR
dc.publisher.departmentPPG - Programas de Pós Graduação - Itabirapt_BR
dc.publisher.programPPG - Programas de Pós Graduação - Itabirapt_BR
dc.publisher.initialsUNIFEIpt_BR
dc.subject.cnpqCNPQ::CIENCIAS SOCIAIS APLICADAS::ADMINISTRACAO::ADMINISTRACAO DE EMPRESAS::ADMINISTRACAO DA PRODUCAOpt_BR
dc.relation.referencesALAHYARI, Hiva; BERNTSSON SVENSSON, Richard; GORSCHEK, Tony. A study of value in agile software development organizations. Journal of Systems and Software, v. 125, p. 271–288, 2017. Disponível em: <http://dx.doi.org/10.1016/j.jss.2016.12.007>. ALAHYARI, Hiva; GORSCHEK, Tony; BERNTSSON SVENSSON, Richard. An exploratory study of waste in software development organizations using agile or lean approaches: A multiple case study at 14 organizations. Information and Software Technology, v. 105, n. July 2017, p. 78–94, 2019. Disponível em: <https://doi.org/10.1016/j.infsof.2018.08.006>. BAVANI, Raja. Global software engineering: Challenges in customer value creation. Proceedings - 5th International Conference on Global Software Engineering, ICGSE 2010, p. 119–122, 2010. BECK, Kent et al. Manifesto for Agile Software Development. The Agile Alliance, p. 12–14, 2001. Disponível em: <http://agilemanifesto.org/>. BOSCH, Jan et al. The early stage software startup development model: A framework for operationalizing lean principles in software startups. 2013, Berlin: Springer, 2013. p. 1–15. CAGAN, Marty. INSPIRED: How to Create Tech Products Customers Love. 2. ed. [S.l.]: Wiley, 2017. EGGERT, Andreas; ULAGA, Wolfgang. Customer perceived value: A substitute for satisfaction in business markets? Journal of Business & Industrial Marketing, v. 17, n. 2–3, p. 107–118, 1 abr. 2002. FABIJAN, Aleksander et al. The Online Controlled Experiment Lifecycle. IEEE Software, v. 37, n. 2, p. 60–67, 2020. FABIJAN, Aleksander; OLSSON, Helena Holmström; BOSCH, Jan. The lack of sharing of customer data in large software organizations: Challenges and implications. 2016, Cham: Springer, 2016. p. 39–52. FORMAN, Ernest; PENMAN, Kirti. AGGREGATING INDIVIDUAL JUDGMENTS AND PRIORITIES WITH THE ANALYTIC HIERARCHY PROCESS. ISAHP. [S.l: s.n.], 1996. GIARDINO, Carmine et al. Key Challenges in Early-Stage Software Startups. 2015, Cham: Springer, 2015. p. 52–63. Disponível em: <http://link.springer.com/10.1007/978-3-319- 18612-2_5>. HU, Jin Yang. Software Traceability Investigating the perceived value of software traceability in practice. 2019. Master Thesis – Utrecht University, 2019. KASAULI, Rashidah; KNAUSS, Eric; et al. Adding value every sprint: A case study on large-scale continuous requirements engineering. CEUR Workshop Proceedings, v. 1796, 2017. KASAULI, Rashidah; LIEBEL, Grischa; et al. Requirements Engineering Challenges in Large-Scale Agile System Development. Proceedings - 2017 IEEE 25th International Requirements Engineering Conference, RE 2017, p. 352–361, 2017. KAUPPINEN, Marjo et al. From feature development to customer value creation. Proceedings of the IEEE International Conference on Requirements Engineering, p. 275–280, 2009. KHURUM, Mahvish; GORSCHEK, Tony; WILSON, Magnus. The software value map – an exhaustive collection of value aspects for the development of software intensive products. Journal of Software: Evolution and Process, v. 25, n. 7, p. 711–741, jul. 2013. Disponível em: <http://doi.wiley.com/10.1002/smr.1560>. KIM, Neunghoe et al. Customer value-based HW/SW partitioning decision in embedded systems. Proc. 9th ACIS Int. Conf. Software Engineering, Artificial Intelligence, Networking and Parallel/Distributed Computing, SNPD 2008 and 2nd Int. Workshop on Advanced Internet Technology and Applications, p. 257–262, 2008. KITCHENHAM, B.; CHARTERS, S. Guidelines for performing Systematic Literature Reviews in Software Engineering. EBSE 2007-001, v. 001, 2007. KOMSSI, Marko et al. Roadmapping problems in practice: value creation from the perspective of the customers. Requirements Engineering, v. 20, n. 1, p. 45–69, 2015. LINDGREN, Eveliina; MÜNCH, Jürgen. Raising the odds of success: the current state of experimentation in product development. Information and Software Technology, v. 77, p. 80–91, 2016. MADURIKA, HKGM; HEMAKUMARA, GPTS. GIS Based Analysis For Suitability Location Finding In The Residential Development Areas Of Greater Matara Region. Article in International Journal of Scientific & Technology Research, v. 6, p. 2, 2017. Disponível em: <www.ijstr.org>. MÜNCH, Jürgen et al. Creating minimum viable products in industry-academia collaborations. 2013, Berlin: Springer, 2013. p. 137–151. OLSSON, Helena Holmström; BOSCH, Jan. Towards continuous validation of customer value. ACM International Conference Proceeding Series, v. 25-29- May-, p. 0–3, 2015. OLSSON, H.H.; BOSCH, J. The Five Purposes of Value Modeling. 2020, [S.l: s.n.], 2020. p. 110–119. PARAS, M K; PAL, R; EKWALL, D. Systematic literature review to develop a conceptual framework for a reuse-based clothing value chain. The International Review of Retail, Distribution and Consumer Research, v. 28, n. 3, p. 231–258, 2017. POPPENDIECK, By Mary; POPPENDIECK, Tom. Lean software development: an agile toolkit Software Development Managers. [S.l: s.n.], 2003. v. 36. RIES, Eric. The Lean Startup: How Today’s Entrepreneurs Use Continuous Innovation to Create Radically Successful Businesses. [S.l.]: Crown Business, 2011. SAATY, Thomas L. Decision making with the analytic hierarchy process. Int. J. Services Sciences. [S.l: s.n.], 2008. SAATY, Thomas L. DECISION MAKING-THE ANALYTIC HIERARCHY AND NETWORK PROCESSES (AHP/ANP). JOURNAL OF SYSTEMS SCIENCE AND SYSTEMS ENGINEERING, v. 13, n. 1, p. 1–35, 2004. SAATY, Thomas L; KATZ, Joseph M. How to make a decision: The Analytic Hierarchy Process. European Journal of Operational Research. [S.l: s.n.], 1990. SAMBINELLI, F.; BORGES, M.A.F. Analyzing the drivers of the strategies adoptions to increase customer value in agile software development. 2019, [S.l: s.n.], 2019. p. 299–306. SAMBINELLI, Fernando; BORGES, Marcos A.F. Analyzing the drivers of the strategies adoptions to increase customer value in agile software development. ACM International Conference Proceeding Series, p. 299–306, 2019. SAMBINELLI, Fernando; FRANCISCO BORGES, Marcos Augusto. Survey on strategies to increase customer value in Brazilian Agile software development companies. Iberian Conference on Information Systems and Technologies, CISTI, v. 2019-June, n. June, p. 19–22, 2019. SÁNCHEZ-FERNÁNDEZ, Raquel; INIESTA-BONILLO, M. Ángeles. The concept of perceived value: A systematic review of the research. Marketing Theory, v. 7, n. 4, p. 427–451, 2007. TANG, J.; ZHANG, B.; AKRAM, U. User willingness to purchase applications on mobile intelligent devices: evidence from app store. Asia Pacific Journal of Marketing and Logistics, v. 32, n. 8, p. 1629–1649, 2020. TRIANTAPHYLLOU, Evangelos. Multi-criteria Decision Making Methods: A Comparative Study. Boston, MA: Springer US, 2000. v. 44. Disponível em: <http://link.springer.com/10.1007/978-1-4757-3157-6>. (Applied Optimization). TRICHAISRI, S. Intention to adopt non-functional requirements: Determinants and consequences of perceived value and perceived risk. Science and Technology Asia, v. 26, n. 1, p. 127–141, 2021. WĄTRÓBSKI, Jarosław et al. Generalised framework for multi-criteria method selection. Omega (United Kingdom), v. 86, p. 107–124, 1 jul. 2019. YALCIN, Ahmet Selcuk; KILIC, Huseyin Selcuk; DELEN, Dursun. The use of multi-criteria decision-making methods in business analytics: A comprehensive literature review. Technological Forecasting and Social Change, v. 174, 1 jan. 2022. YU, Dejian et al. Analysis of Collaboration Evolution in AHP Research: 1982-2018. International Journal of Information Technology and Decision Making. [S.l.]: World Scientific. , 1 jan. 2021 ZAHEDI, Mansooreh; SHAHIN, Mojtaba; ALI BABAR, Muhammad. A systematic review of knowledge sharing challenges and practices in global software development. International Journal of Information Management, v. 36, n. 6, p. 995–1019, 2016.pt_BR
dc.title.alternativeApplication of the Analytical Hierarchy Process in prioritizing customer value in the software development processpt_BR
Aparece nas coleções:Dissertações

Arquivos associados a este item:
Arquivo Descrição TamanhoFormato 
Dissertacao Thulio Eugenio Portes de Almeida Ricomini.pdfRICOMINI, Thulio Eugenio Portes de Almeida. Aplicação do Analytic Hierarchy Process na priorização de valor para o cliente no processo de desenvolvimento de software. 2022. 62. Dissertação (Mestrado Profissional em Engenharia de Produção, Universidade Federal de Itajubá, Campus de Itabira, Minas Gerais, 2022.1,01 MBAdobe PDFVisualizar/Abrir


Os itens no repositório estão protegidos por copyright, com todos os direitos reservados, salvo quando é indicado o contrário.