Resumo:
The costs from electrical equipment failures and the unavailability of the power supply
directly impact the utilities' operational results. Therefore, improving the reliability of the
electricity supply is one of the technical reasons for investing in the electrical power system,
especially power substations. Investments in measurement and monitoring systems allow a
more assertive diagnosis of equipment insulation and are essential to improve condition-based
maintenance protocols, increasing reliability and minimizing fault occurrence. In this context,
diagnosing the equipment insulation quality with partial discharges (PD) measurements is a
valuable resource that is widely used. However, there are difficulties in analyzing the measured
signals since, during PD measurements, it is common for more than one phenomenon to cooccur,
whether noise or multiple PD sources, compromising the analysis and subsequent
identification and classification of the PD activities. In this light, to contribute to solving this
problem, the objective is to develop a cost-effective solution that allows for assertively
measuring, separating, and classifying the basic types of partial discharges found during PD
measurements in electrical equipment: corona, superficial, and internal. The proposed solution
consists of hardware integrated with software capable of measuring, separating, and classifying
partial discharges. The solution has digitizing hardware suitable for PD measurements and
flexibility to work with conventional (IEC 60270) and non-conventional methods. The software
allows the control of measurement settings by applying noise mitigation techniques and PD
pulse extraction; it also allows the separation of the measured phenomena in different PRPD
(Phase Resolved Partial Discharges) patterns with a Time-Frequency Map (T-F Map). The
measurement validation process, which includes measurements with a PD simulator,
demonstrates the solution's reliability. The work evaluated the separation of partial discharges
with the PD pulses measured in the stator of a generator and measurements of simultaneous
partial discharge sources provided by the PD simulator. Finally, this work validates the results
of the identification mechanism for PD categories, corona, surface, and internal, with a test
dataset extracted from the general database developed. The results indicate that the proposed
solution could adequately measure the partial discharge signals, producing PRPD patterns
equivalent to those obtained with the commercial system, with deviations of less than 4% for
the parameters evaluated, as well as for the measurement of apparent charge, in which the
average error was 1.3%. Despite its limitations, the separation provided by the T-F Map was
satisfactory and could separate overlapping PD. The identification mechanism classified the
three basic PD types with an accuracy of 95.4%.