Resumo:
Science fiction has been one of the most popular genres in literature since its emergence in the
19th century. The genre sought to look at the future, imagining new technological advances,
that then seemed unlimited, which brought it closer to the literature of utopia and dystopia.
After the end of World War II and the explosion of the atomic bomb, optimism in a world
guided by science diminishes considerably and dystopias considered the very end of civilization
through the apocalyptic and post-apocalyptic subgenres. The nuclear cataclysm remained
popular in fictional works throughout the century, but in 1970s, a new threat proved to be just
as dangerous for human civilization: the environmental crises. The prognosis of a collapse
created a dystopian imagery as powerful as that of a nuclear war. It was also a threat to the
capitalist mode of production since external limits to economic growth are established. If the
atomic bomb showed the destructive potential of war technology, environmental crises call into
question the same technological artifacts that allowed the optimism in the 19th century. This
dissertation asks how works of dystopian fiction characterize environmental crises over the last
century. Therefore, climatic dystopias are the object of study, defined as: fictional works located
in the near or distant future that describe a worse society, according to the author, than that of
the moment and place in which it was written and that deal with ecological or environmental
issues such as the focus, or one of the focuses, of the dysfunctionality of their world. Its
objective is to investigate the different critical perceptions regarding technology in climatic
dystopias. To do so, it proposes to examine the history of the belief in anthropogenic climate
change, to compare the dystopian character of science fiction works throughout the 20th century
and to identify in these specific criticisms the technology, taking into account its historical and
artistic context. In the results, it is observed that: the opposition between civilization and nature
is a recurring theme in the works studied, when reflecting on alternative modes of existence
outside modern industrial society; The works proved to be useful for the study of the history of
environmental crises, by revealing characteristics of key moments of awareness regarding
these; And, finally, there is no linearity in their criticism of technological progress, but they all
manifest positions contrary to the capitalist way of life.