Resumo:
This work aim to analyze how the quality improvement is boarded in the operational
level at manufacture enterprises whose result of productive process depends on intensive
labor. Therefore, it is proposed to identify in the literature, elements to be considered in
quality improvement process in the operational level, to analyze how these elements are being
boarded at the selected enterprises of the case study and to propose improvement actions for
the object study enterprises.
To reach these objectives was chosen the descriptive or applied research with qualitative
approach. The case study was detached by the must adequate research method. Two
manufature industries were selected. The criterions to select these enterprises were based in
the productive process performance related with conformities measured though the sigma
level, or still, confrontation with a low operational quality level manufacture industry (sigma
level ≤ 3) and a world class industry (sigma level ≥ 5). Primaries data were used gained by
interviews and observations and secondary data gained by studied enterprises documents.
The fundamentals elements identified to the manufacture industries quality
improvement were: quality education and training, quality participation and involvement,
problems solving and existence of simultaneous programs that contributed with continuous
improvement.
Through the collected data referring to the observed elements, was verified that the
enterprise A has almost 100% of them presented. Enterprise B has some absence in all
elements, with emphasis in existence of simultaneous programs that contributed with
continuous improvement.
Related with the research variables, it was concluded trough the relation diagram, which
is illustrated on chapter 4, through the interviews and observations that the fundamentals
elements identified to the manufacture industries quality improvement have relation with the
quality operational level of manufacture industries and the first element has priority.
Through the study research units, or still, enterprise A with low assembly non conformities index (low DPMO) and enterprise B with high assembly non-conformities index
(high DPMO), was verified that the patterns established in chapter 3 were carried out, or still,
enterprises that have many elements implemented and structured have high quality
operational level with low assembly non-conformities index (low DPMO) and companies that
have few elements implemented and failures of structure have low quality operational level
with high assembly non-conformities index (high DPMO).